🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, though, may align too neatly with the mythologized version circulated by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a endorsement rather than a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have collaborated to forge a tailor-made persona of Putin. This figure is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show launched last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “rescue” the nation from disorder. While he is called Mikhail, the implication is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions often end up buttressing this same narrative rather than undercutting it. An adaptation inspired by a popular book sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him not as a cause but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the spin doctors around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is shown as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to steady the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. He replies is that he would rather govern from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. Historically, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one actually pleaded with him to take the job. The presidency was effectively a casting call with no shortage of contenders. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the state de facto.

• The shortlist featured several politicians, among them a reformer later murdered and a security service director.
• According to an expert who researched his rise, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman close to the process stated the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Claims about his “recruitment work” in Dresden fall apart under examination. In essence, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by the actor's arrival as James Bond. His harder version led Russian media and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images swapping Craig’s face with Putin’s appeared on city centers, feeding the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. His influence is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.